View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 9020
Back to top |
|
goldy
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 421
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:32 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
i agree i hate the universal floor scheme they are using for all the regional games in mens and womens and the first/second round for men. it started a couple years ago on the mens side. have the women had it in the past? i cant remember.
|
|
CompSci87
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 812 Location: Palo Alto, CA
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:39 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Pohlen found the 3-point line OK!
|
|
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 9020
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:40 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I think that since the women's qst and 2nd round games are on college floors, they leave them alone.
When they go to a neutral sight, the NCAA can make more demands in order to award the games, I'm guessing.
I think what bothers me is that the lines look blurry with the strip of neutral floor in between the black.
That makes my mind wonder which is right or something.
|
|
CompSci87
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 812 Location: Palo Alto, CA
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:44 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I'm still trying to figure out why the thread title is Stan/GA when the thread is all about the line markings on the courts...
|
|
goldy
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 421
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:46 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
CompSci87 wrote: |
I'm still trying to figure out why the thread title is Stan/GA when the thread is all about the line markings on the courts... |
Because the game is close?
|
|
auntie
Joined: 16 May 2006 Posts: 1774 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:46 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Not much of a game after the first few minutes.
_________________ A woman's place is in the paint--Another artist for Liberty.
|
|
bricklayer
Joined: 30 Jan 2009 Posts: 1031
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:49 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Best sign for Stanford has been the guards stepping up the last few games. Jj getting good minutes tonight and finding her shot again.
|
|
FS02
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 9699 Location: Husky (west coast) Country
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:50 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Zzzz... hope the next game will be better.
_________________ @dtmears2
|
|
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 9020
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:51 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
CompSci87 wrote: |
I'm still trying to figure out why the thread title is Stan/GA when the thread is all about the line markings on the courts... |
Because I'm watching the Stan/GA game and wanted to comment on it.
Shoot me.
And nothing is really gong on in this game or you'd be talking about it instead of complaing about the title and content of this thread..
|
|
bricklayer
Joined: 30 Jan 2009 Posts: 1031
Back to top |
|
CompSci87
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 812 Location: Palo Alto, CA
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 8:57 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Ex-Ref wrote: |
CompSci87 wrote: |
I'm still trying to figure out why the thread title is Stan/GA when the thread is all about the line markings on the courts... |
Because I'm watching the Stan/GA game and wanted to comment on it.
Shoot me.
And nothing is really gong on in this game or you'd be talking about it instead of complaing about the title and content of this thread.. |
No need to be touchy, I was just puzzled why the title and topic didn't match up.
Generally I really like your posts, with your ref's perspective.
|
|
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 9020
Back to top |
|
FS02
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 9699 Location: Husky (west coast) Country
Back to top |
|
CompSci87
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 812 Location: Palo Alto, CA
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:08 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Anyone notice it looks like Ros has her pinkie and ring finger taped together on her shooting hand?
|
|
MNfan22
Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 2750
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:13 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
This game is so over. Stanford just has to get through it without any one getting hurt.
_________________ Minnesota Lynx-est 1999-WNBA Champs! '11,'13,'15, '17
|
|
Force10rulz
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 1966 Location: Puget Sound
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:22 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Stanford is playing like UConn, taking no prisoners, and playing like they are not 32 pts ahead.
_________________ Seattle Storm 3 times Champions
|
|
Ex-Ref
Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 9020
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:26 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
OK is:
A) Stanford this good.
B) GA this bad.
C) GA tired from all of the travel.
D) All of the above.
|
|
coffy73
Joined: 24 Sep 2009 Posts: 2605
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:34 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Ex-Ref wrote: |
OK is:
A) Stanford this good.
B) GA this bad.
C) GA tired from all of the travel.
D) All of the above. |
I'll take B, but put in a little of A, lol! Like most have said, there's UConn, then drop a bit to Stanford, and then there's everybody else way down. To me, GA ain't that good to begin with.
|
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 63934
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:35 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Ex-Ref wrote: |
OK is:
A) Stanford this good.
B) GA this bad.
C) GA tired from all of the travel.
D) All of the above. |
Emphasis on B & C with a smidgon of D
_________________ Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
|
|
CompSci87
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 812 Location: Palo Alto, CA
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:42 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I'll take A.
|
|
deanjet
Joined: 03 Nov 2004 Posts: 779
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:42 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Ex-Ref wrote: |
OK is:
A) Stanford this good.
B) GA this bad.
C) GA tired from all of the travel.
D) All of the above. |
I'll go with A. Georgia has struggle on offense all year, so I figured the trend would continue tonight; however, Stanford is still up 40 points in the sweet 16. That's extremely impressive, imo.
_________________ WPS!
|
|
bballfan2005
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 25315 Location: Somewhere here and there
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:45 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
When teams play UConn and Stanford this year, there should be a damn mercy rule. SMH. Georgia is every bit as bad as Stanford is good, I believe. Their (UGA) offense is poo poo.
_________________ Avatar: The King has his ring!
Mathies to LA 2013
|
|
Force10rulz
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 1966 Location: Puget Sound
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 9:51 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
They are that good, and I know PAC 10 isn't that hard of but they have played other teams, hence the #2 seed. GA can't be tired from traveling, everyone had 4 days before this game, so if they didn't fly right to Sac until the day before this game, well that was stupid. I have not seen GA play enough to know how good they are, they got this far so they can't be that bad. Who knows how they will stand up against UConn; I prefer to take one match at a time and not worry about who is going to be in the next game let alone the final.
_________________ Seattle Storm 3 times Champions
|
|
njjosh
Joined: 07 Nov 2004 Posts: 1458
Back to top |
Posted: 03/27/10 10:49 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I think it's pretty clear that this tournament is UConn, Stanford and everyone else. It's going to be a major upset if those two teams aren't playing for all of the marbles a week from Tuesday in San Antonio.
|
|
|
|