RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Nancy on the Shock at No. 4 and 40-story Charles Barkleys
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BCBG25



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 20112
Location: Sampa


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 4:45 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Tell me this is just banter and you're not discussing a deal involving NY *and* Detroit? I mean, seriously...



_________________
Kings of the World!
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66920
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 4:50 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

BCBG25 wrote:
Tell me this is just banter and you're not discussing a deal involving NY *and* Detroit? I mean, seriously...


I'm just spitballing. My first inclination was #4 and #11 for #7 and Christon. I doubt the Lib would do it, though.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
eyevolley4



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 4636



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 4:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think the contingency that Wiggins is available is too iffy for anyone to make a deal prior to the draft. I would anticipate that if Wiggins is the prize any team is after, they will first have to make certain that Minnesota is not selecting her or deal with Minnesota directly.



_________________
Some days are meant to be remembered.
gpark33



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 5116



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 5:04 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

eyevolley4 wrote:
I think the contingency that Wiggins is available is too iffy for anyone to make a deal prior to the draft. I would anticipate that if Wiggins is the prize any team is after, they will first have to make certain that Minnesota is not selecting her or deal with Minnesota directly.


Which is exactly why I hope the Lib staff will take Blaze's phone off the hook for when SFO comes calling.


DTP



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 6434
Location: Ohio


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 5:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
BCBG25 wrote:
Tell me this is just banter and you're not discussing a deal involving NY *and* Detroit? I mean, seriously...


I'm just spitballing. My first inclination was #4 and #11 for #7 and Christon. I doubt the Lib would do it, though.


Uh nah, Christon can stay where she is or at least away from Detroit.


PistonShockFan0318



Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 447
Location: Michigan


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 6:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

as I've said before I wouldn't be surprised if SFO trades the #4 for a veteran all star. I'm sure there are a lot of teams out there that would love the #4 pick in this draft. And would trade for it.



_________________
Play with heart and determination! DEE-TROIT Basketball!
bullsky



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 20310



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 8:07 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Chicago might be tempted, they have many holes to fill, and the one big piece is more useful to Detroit than the two smaller ones.


Just curious, but what holes do you think need to be filled?



_________________
"Don't do something until you get it right, do it until you can't do it wrong."
- Geno Auriemma
michalu



Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 202
Location: Krakow - Poland


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 8:10 pm    ::: Re: Nancy on the Shock at No. 4 and 40-story Charles Barkley Reply Reply with quote

gopher5 wrote:
This was pretty funny to read:

Quote:
Who do you see as being the best non-rookie newcomer to the WNBA in 2008? A foreign player? A formerly drafted player who will finally make a team and make a difference?
-Tony, Albuquerque

Well, Sandrine Gruda could come to Connecticut and play a solid role this season, but I've got a sleeper for you.

Her name is Jelena Skerovic, she's from Montenegro and she's playing at Wisla Can Pack in Poland this winter. She's the one who Elaine Powell belted a few years back. She's up-tempo, she's only 27 and I think she could add a lot to whoever signs her.


I don't know why she mentioned it. It doesn't have an influence on her abilities. We all know that pissing off EP is not a hard thing.

Your comments are very funny, but it doesn't change that Jelena is great PG. Year by year she plays better basketball and she deserves to play in WNBA.


gpark33



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 5116



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 8:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think it will be interesting to see what the #4 ultimately lands. I feel like I am following the "one red paper clip" path all over again.

So to recap so far...

#4 and Hodges for Izi and #8
#4 for Swin

What's next and what's the record for how many time a single pick has been traded?


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66920
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 8:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Orange][Krush wrote:
pilight wrote:
Chicago might be tempted, they have many holes to fill, and the one big piece is more useful to Detroit than the two smaller ones.


Just curious, but what holes do you think need to be filled?


They need a point guard, a center, another reliable outside shooter (especially if Dales actually retires), and more depth on the wing.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24356
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 9:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Orange][Krush wrote:
pilight wrote:
Chicago might be tempted, they have many holes to fill, and the one big piece is more useful to Detroit than the two smaller ones.


Just curious, but what holes do you think need to be filled?


They need a point guard, a center, another reliable outside shooter (especially if Dales actually retires), and more depth on the wing.


And while it would obviously be a natural side-effect if they got some of those things, they also need depth. You don't need much depth in this league, but you need some, especially if your good players aren't truly elite players. Chicago are probably going to have six players this season that I would call 'good' or better. No one else on the roster should be playing more than 5 or 10 backup minutes for anybody, and they've only got a couple of those.

ETA: Still don't think they'll give up the #2 pick for anything (except theoretically to move up to the #1).


bullsky



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 20310



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 9:34 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Orange][Krush wrote:
pilight wrote:
Chicago might be tempted, they have many holes to fill, and the one big piece is more useful to Detroit than the two smaller ones.


Just curious, but what holes do you think need to be filled?


They need a (A)point guard, (B) a center, (C) another reliable outside shooter (especially if Dales actually retires), (D) and more depth on the wing.


(A) I think Dom has done a good job at point thus far. She's not a natural point guard, but she seems to be running out team well. Plus, she's a vet. How many expansion teams get a veteran of her calibre in just their second year? I think we could use another back up though. Maybe we can hopefully get Franklin or White in the third round. With so many solid players this season, some players are bound to drop to the third. If not, maybe try to work out a trade to get Sharp from Indy or Derevjanik from Phoenix.

(B) Fowles, Sylvia.

(C) I agree here. Wyckoff has slowed offensively, but is still such a tough player, so we need her nonetheless. Coggins and Raymond will likely not stay. Someone like Svet Abrosimova would be nice here, though I doubt we'll get her. I know the Sky will heavily pursue DePaul standout Allie Quigley. I feel she'll be an excellent shooter in the WNBA.

(D) With Dales, Wyckoff and possibly Dupree, I think we're fine at the wing.



_________________
"Don't do something until you get it right, do it until you can't do it wrong."
- Geno Auriemma
Richyyy



Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 24356
Location: London


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 10:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Orange][Krush wrote:
(D) With Dales, Wyckoff and possibly Dupree, I think we're fine at the wing.

Haha. Dales is probably gone, Wyckoff is one of the most bizarrely overrated role players in the league and Dupree's a four.

You need to remember that Chicago finished last in the East last season, behind a bunch of teams that had problems and issues all year long, and there were reasons for that. Upgrades are still necessary and third-round pick rookie point-guards aren't going to do it.


bullsky



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 20310



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 10:35 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:
You need to remember that Chicago finished last in the East last season, behind a bunch of teams that had problems and issues all year long, and there were reasons for that. Upgrades are still necessary and third-round pick rookie point-guards aren't going to do it.


We only finished two games behind the fourth place team, New York. I know there are upgrades to be had, but some people are acting as if we need more drastic changes than we really do. Oh well. That's why the play the games. And no, we won't be trading down the pick, sorry. Bo was in Baton Rouge last night and witnessed Fowles dominating UCONN in the paint. If he trades the pick, he needs to be fired. He's not that stupid.



_________________
"Don't do something until you get it right, do it until you can't do it wrong."
- Geno Auriemma
FS02



Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 9699
Location: Husky (west coast) Country


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 11:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Orange][Krush wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
You need to remember that Chicago finished last in the East last season, behind a bunch of teams that had problems and issues all year long, and there were reasons for that. Upgrades are still necessary and third-round pick rookie point-guards aren't going to do it.


We only finished two games behind the fourth place team, New York. I know there are upgrades to be had, but some people are acting as if we need more drastic changes than we really do. Oh well. That's why the play the games. And no, we won't be trading down the pick, sorry. Bo was in Baton Rouge last night and witnessed Fowles dominating UCONN in the paint. If he trades the pick, he needs to be fired. He's not that stupid.


Remember, teams are going to be thinner this year because of the Olympics and expansion. Chicago didn't lose much in the expansion draft, they don't really depend on any foreign players, and they are young and therefore hopefully improving... Big Syl will make an impact right away on both ends of the floor, so they are in not such bad shape. Richyyy, you might be right about them needing a wing though.


Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18031
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/26/08 11:32 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
Richyyy wrote:
What are Atlanta or New York going to give SFO that he'd want while trading down?


Davenport? That would free him to take Hornbuckle.


Bahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaahahahahahhahahahaha.

Big sweet Jess who we can't even get to be tough enough to be a Libkid… as a Bad Girl… bahahahahahaahahaha, yeah, that'd work about as well as Vanessa Hayden in Paul Ball.

Thanks, pilight, I needed that.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
DTP



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 6434
Location: Ohio


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/08 12:52 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

lol I even had to laugh at that Davenport one. We'll take Tiffany Jackson though! She looks like she could have some Bad Girl in her...


eyevolley4



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 4636



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/08 9:33 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Richyyy wrote:

...Wyckoff is one of the most bizarrely overrated role players in the league...


One shot sure does go a long way...



_________________
Some days are meant to be remembered.
Shades



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 63780



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/08 1:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

gpark33 wrote:

If Minny pretty much JUST needs post players, they should totally trade #3 for the 2 Lib picks.


How about the #3 pick for McCarville?


gpark33



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 5116



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/08 2:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
gpark33 wrote:

If Minny pretty much JUST needs post players, they should totally trade #3 for the 2 Lib picks.


How about the #3 pick for McCarville?


No.


Queenie



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18031
Location: Queens


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/08 6:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Shades wrote:
gpark33 wrote:

If Minny pretty much JUST needs post players, they should totally trade #3 for the 2 Lib picks.


How about the #3 pick for McCarville?


Seconding the nos on that one. Although a couple of us were tossing around Cathrine Kraayeveld and the Liberty's two first-rounders for the #3 and a point guard of Minnesota's choice, if only because I'd want to see something concrete for giving up a starter and two first-round draft picks, and I could deal with pretty much any of the Lynx guards as Loree's backup.



_________________
Ardent believer in the separation of church and stadium.
root_thing



Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 7365
Location: Underground


Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/08 7:34 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Queenie wrote:

Seconding the nos on that one. Although a couple of us were tossing around Cathrine Kraayeveld and the Liberty's two first-rounders for the #3 and a point guard of Minnesota's choice, if only because I'd want to see something concrete for giving up a starter and two first-round draft picks, and I could deal with pretty much any of the Lynx guards as Loree's backup.


First, you'd have to get their GM drunk to convince him Kraay is a post player. Wink



_________________
You can always do something else.
bullsky



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 20310



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/08 7:39 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Is J-Mac even worth the 3? She had one good year.



_________________
"Don't do something until you get it right, do it until you can't do it wrong."
- Geno Auriemma
NYL_WNBA_FAN



Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 14097



Back to top
PostPosted: 02/27/08 7:54 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Orange][Krush wrote:
Is J-Mac even worth the 3? She had one good year.


One could simply argue that that is one more good year than the #3 pick has had in the WNBA. But also considering the polish on J-Mac's offensive game and the swagger that she adds to the Lib, it isn't even worthy of mentioning. If you even go by the projections on your WNBA draft site, it sounds like any of the post players below the 2nd pick have enough question marks that their long term prospects of being as good or better than J-Mac seem unlikely.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin