View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mzonefan
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 4878 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Back to top |
Posted: 04/20/16 12:55 pm ::: Pre-Season Bracketology |
Reply |
|
Charlie's got a "way too early look" for Bracketology.
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/bracketology
In my area of the world, Central Michigan is projected as the MAC winner and a 13 seed. Michigan is projected as a 9 seed and Michigan State a 12 seed/last four in.
The other B1G teams are Maryland and Ohio State at 2 and Indiana at 6.
|
|
ArtBest23
Joined: 02 Jul 2013 Posts: 14550
Back to top |
Posted: 04/20/16 1:30 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
You might want to look at the thread
"Charlie Creme's way-too-early preseason top 25"
|
|
Phil
Joined: 22 Oct 2011 Posts: 1273
Back to top |
Posted: 04/20/16 3:16 pm ::: Re: Pre-Season Bracketology |
Reply |
|
mzonefan wrote: |
Charlie's got a "way too early look" for Bracketology.
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/bracketology
In my area of the world, Central Michigan is projected as the MAC winner and a 13 seed. Michigan is projected as a 9 seed and Michigan State a 12 seed/last four in.
The other B1G teams are Maryland and Ohio State at 2 and Indiana at 6. |
My vague recollection (with emphasis on "vague") is that Charlie doesn't do a full-blown analysis of the likely winners of conferences outside of maybe the big five, but defaults to either the previous year conference winner or maybe the previous year conference tournament winner. I suppose it would be hard to find some counterexamples to prove my assumption is incorrect but that's my recollection
|
|
mzonefan
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 4878 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Back to top |
Posted: 04/22/16 6:19 am ::: |
Reply |
|
ArtBest23 wrote: |
You might want to look at the thread
"Charlie Creme's way-too-early preseason top 25" |
Separate topics and links.
|
|
Phil
Joined: 22 Oct 2011 Posts: 1273
Back to top |
Posted: 04/22/16 12:48 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Charlie has TAMU failing to get a bid. I know they lost a lot, but will they be that bad?
|
|
Fighting Artichoke
Joined: 12 Dec 2012 Posts: 4040
Back to top |
Posted: 04/22/16 12:52 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Phil wrote: |
Charlie has TAMU failing to get a bid. I know they lost a lot, but will they be that bad? |
I agree. It seems hard to believe that they would fall that far. At least he has them in the first 4 out!
|
|
mzonefan
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 4878 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Back to top |
Posted: 04/22/16 1:00 pm ::: Re: Pre-Season Bracketology |
Reply |
|
Phil wrote: |
mzonefan wrote: |
Charlie's got a "way too early look" for Bracketology.
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/bracketology
In my area of the world, Central Michigan is projected as the MAC winner and a 13 seed. Michigan is projected as a 9 seed and Michigan State a 12 seed/last four in.
The other B1G teams are Maryland and Ohio State at 2 and Indiana at 6. |
My vague recollection (with emphasis on "vague") is that Charlie doesn't do a full-blown analysis of the likely winners of conferences outside of maybe the big five, but defaults to either the previous year conference winner or maybe the previous year conference tournament winner. I suppose it would be hard to find some counterexamples to prove my assumption is incorrect but that's my recollection |
That would not be correct in Central Michigan's projection. Ohio had the best record in the regular season and Buffalo won the MAC Tournament.
|
|
summertime blues
Joined: 16 Apr 2013 Posts: 7828 Location: Shenandoah Valley
Back to top |
|
GlennMacGrady
Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 8225 Location: Heisenberg
Back to top |
Posted: 04/22/16 3:12 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
NC St. but no Duke, no UNC. Tobacco Road has changed direction. |
|
Marquette Fan
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 3575
Back to top |
|
|
|