RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Why Loyd leaving early is a good thing
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66773
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 12:40 pm    ::: Why Loyd leaving early is a good thing Reply Reply with quote

http://sports.espn.go.com/wnba/story/_/id/12699118/why-jewell-loyd-leaving-nd-early-good-thing

Quote:
Dismissing Loyd's decision without careful consideration about what it might represent is myopic.



_________________
Let us not deceive ourselves. Our educational institutions have proven to be no bastions of democracy.
purduefanatic



Joined: 10 Aug 2011
Posts: 2819
Location: Indiana


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 12:56 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Good article. I'm not really a Kate Fagan fan but I'm glad she wrote this piece. I have said all along good for Loyd.


summertime blues



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 7746
Location: Shenandoah Valley


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 1:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Meh. But then, I rarely agree with anything Kate Fagan has to say. This article doesn't say that much either.



_________________
Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
scullyfu



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 8851
Location: Niagara Falls


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 1:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

i was happy to see that Fagan mentioned the economic impact of a Euro contract for Loyd, something MM didn't acknowledge. but then, she was in shock and her mind was boggling. Wink



_________________
i'll always bleed Storm green.
ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 1:24 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

summertime blues wrote:
Meh. But then, I rarely agree with anything Kate Fagan has to say. This article doesn't say that much either.


Then maybe you'll like this one better

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/jewell-loyd-wnba-draft/


purduefanatic



Joined: 10 Aug 2011
Posts: 2819
Location: Indiana


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 2:25 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
summertime blues wrote:
Meh. But then, I rarely agree with anything Kate Fagan has to say. This article doesn't say that much either.


Then maybe you'll like this one better

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/jewell-loyd-wnba-draft/


Great article.

Quote:
Fast forward from that hot summer 10 years ago, and here I am, on the morning of a new life adventure: the WNBA. It’s always been a dream of mine to play professional basketball.


How on earth can you question or berate someone for chasing their dreams? This is what she has dreamed of doing and it's now there for her to go get...I don't get why so many people have come down so hard on her decision. Like she says, she will get her degree. But, to that point, for the vast majority of us, the degree is the means to get to our dreams or career...for her, it isn't necessary.

Again, congrats to her on realizing her dreams and best of luck to Ms Loyd!!


summertime blues



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 7746
Location: Shenandoah Valley


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 2:59 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
summertime blues wrote:
Meh. But then, I rarely agree with anything Kate Fagan has to say. This article doesn't say that much either.


Then maybe you'll like this one better

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/jewell-loyd-wnba-draft/


Now this is something I can get next to. It's also the sort of thing that should be a little better known while someone like Jewll Loyd is in school because it would help other kids who are struggling to see that they can make it too.

I have a son who is dyslexic. He's also musically talented, intellectually gifted, and was a very good runner. School wasn't easy for him, and after high school, although he was recruited by some colleges for their track and cross-country programs, he chose the military and became a heavy equipment mechanic. That was his way of dealing with it. I wish there had been better avenues for him at the time, but there weren't any where we were. He has overcome a lot and actually now has about 70% of the credits he needs to graduate from college, many obtained through the military.



_________________
Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
loneycafe



Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Posts: 248



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 3:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
summertime blues wrote:
Meh. But then, I rarely agree with anything Kate Fagan has to say. This article doesn't say that much either.


Then maybe you'll like this one better

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/jewell-loyd-wnba-draft/


Good piece by Loyd. I wish her well.


cthskzfn



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 12851
Location: In a world where a PSYCHOpath like Trump isn't potus.


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 5:34 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Lloyd leaving does no good for WCB, as far as i can see.

That it may do a TINY bit of good for the W is immaterial imo.



_________________
Silly, stupid white people might be waking up.
GlennMacGrady



Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 8151
Location: Heisenberg


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/15 11:50 pm    ::: Re: Why Loyd leaving early is a good thing Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/wnba/story/_/id/12699118/why-jewell-loyd-leaving-nd-early-good-thing


The title of Fagan's article asks, "Was Jewell Loyd's decision bad?"

This question is never answered or even explored in any rigorous way because Fagan never focuses on what her referent is for the adjective "bad". The questions should be: Bad for whom? Bad for what?

Fagan begins an absurd argument that leaving early can be good for women's college basketball because (emphases mine):

"Player movement, or the speculation of, is actually the lifeblood of most professional sports. Part of what fuels media coverage and fan excitement about professional leagues is the wheeling and dealing, the belief that your team is simply one phone call away from landing the league's best player.

"The combination of these three things -- early declarations, trades, free agency -- keeps sports fans perpetually interested in their sport, even during the offseason."

Fagan drops this illogical argument like a hot rock because, as she obviously knows, the dynamic she is describing applies only to professional sports. After a brief and gratuitous curtsey to another irrelevancy -- supposed social and media bias against women's sports -- Fagan ends with the financial truism that Loyd's income will include more than her WNBA salary.

As to "bad for whom" and "bad for what", my opinion is that Loyd's decision is good for her, good for the WNBA, and bad for women's college basketball. A fortiori it is bad for Notre Dame and Muffet McGraw.

What you see depends upon where you stand.
cthskzfn



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 12851
Location: In a world where a PSYCHOpath like Trump isn't potus.


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 7:04 am    ::: Re: Why Loyd leaving early is a good thing Reply Reply with quote

GlennMacGrady wrote:
pilight wrote:
http://sports.espn.go.com/wnba/story/_/id/12699118/why-jewell-loyd-leaving-nd-early-good-thing


The title of Fagan's article asks, "Was Jewell Loyd's decision bad?"

This question is never answered or even explored in any rigorous way because Fagan never focuses on what her referent is for the adjective "bad". The questions should be: Bad for whom? Bad for what?

Fagan begins an absurd argument that leaving early can be good for women's college basketball because (emphases mine):

"Player movement, or the speculation of, is actually the lifeblood of most professional sports. Part of what fuels media coverage and fan excitement about professional leagues is the wheeling and dealing, the belief that your team is simply one phone call away from landing the league's best player.

"The combination of these three things -- early declarations, trades, free agency -- keeps sports fans perpetually interested in their sport, even during the offseason."

Fagan drops this illogical argument like a hot rock because, as she obviously knows, the dynamic she is describing applies only to professional sports. After a brief and gratuitous curtsey to another irrelevancy -- supposed social and media bias against women's sports -- Fagan ends with the financial truism that Loyd's income will include more than her WNBA salary.

As to "bad for whom" and "bad for what", my opinion is that Loyd's decision is good for her, good for the WNBA, and bad for women's college basketball. A fortiori it is bad for Notre Dame and Muffet McGraw.

What you see depends upon where you stand.




Maybe...maybe not. Given the paucity of "FF-quality" teams in WCB, ND has a good chance to reach that destination again next year, sans Lloyd.

Making that assumption, Lloyd's absence should help the F/ing Irish, as silly as it seems, based upon her 2-yr NC performance of 8-33 FGs, which may rank as the worst shooting by the best player in NCAA NC career history.

That said, I don't subscribe to the idiotic idea that Lloyd was motivated to leave ND because of the "specter of losing to UConn in 3 straight NCs". Arrogant nonsense, imo.



_________________
Silly, stupid white people might be waking up.
Nerd2



Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 7659



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 1:42 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I thought the quote that Muffet gave (with my emphasis added) in the linked article were very telling:
http://www.wsbt.com/sports/muffet-mcgraw-loyd-made-bad-decision-to-go-pro/32369432
Quote:
"She didn't really give us an opportunity to try to talk her out of it because the deadline was the very next day to declare. Wish we would have had time when she made that decision, which was apparently a couple weeks before."


A statement like that suggests to me that Muffet had a firm opinion as to what Jewell's decision should be. And her next statement reinforces that:
Quote:
I think it's a really bad decision for women, especially to try to leave early


Given the sequence of events, my suspicion is that Muffet had indicated her opinion strongly enough that Jewell did not feel she'd get honest feedback. I thought it was a bit interesting that neither school of the early declarers seemed to send a representative.


ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 3:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nerd2 wrote:
I thought the quote that Muffet gave (with my emphasis added) in the linked article were very telling:
http://www.wsbt.com/sports/muffet-mcgraw-loyd-made-bad-decision-to-go-pro/32369432
Quote:
"She didn't really give us an opportunity to try to talk her out of it because the deadline was the very next day to declare. Wish we would have had time when she made that decision, which was apparently a couple weeks before."


A statement like that suggests to me that Muffet had a firm opinion as to what Jewell's decision should be. And her next statement reinforces that:
Quote:
I think it's a really bad decision for women, especially to try to leave early


Given the sequence of events, my suspicion is that Muffet had indicated her opinion strongly enough that Jewell did not feel she'd get honest feedback. I thought it was a bit interesting that neither school of the early declarers seemed to send a representative.


That feedback likely was "honest."

I have been fully supportive that it was Jewell's decision to make, but I don't think lying to your coach about your decision is a particularly good way to handle it.


dtrain34



Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 409
Location: Lacey, Washington


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 7:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I never had a single issue with Lloyd leaving early.

I did post several times that it was disingenuous to say she was leaving to "declare for the WNBA draft." That was a convenient shorthand the typical fan would understand but which made the W seem like the attraction and not the Euros. (Not too many Americans would buy "I am leaving to pursue my lifelong dream of playing for Valosun Brno")



At least Fagan made that part of the equation clear.


linkster



Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 5408



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 7:46 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Are there rules about pro teams and/or agents contacting college players during the season? It may well have been that up until ND lost to UConn Loyd had no idea of what her future could be like, but once her season was over Seattle could contact her and more than that, she could have been contacted by representatives of alien teams specifying what her earning potential could be if she turned pro as the No 1 pick. Knowing that you would definitely be the top choice in the draft might influence your decision and Loyd may not have had that assurance until after the FF semis.


cthskzfn



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 12851
Location: In a world where a PSYCHOpath like Trump isn't potus.


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 7:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

linkster wrote:
Are there rules about pro teams and/or agents contacting college players during the season? It may well have been that up until ND lost to UConn Loyd had no idea of what her future could be like, but once her season was over Seattle could contact her and more than that, she could have been contacted by representatives of alien teams specifying what her earning potential could be if she turned pro as the No 1 pick. Knowing that you would definitely be the top choice in the draft might influence your decision and Loyd may not have had that assurance until after the FF semis.


If being the #1 pick does have financial advantages over #2, then it was imperative for her to jump now due to Stewart being #1 next year.

I wonder though if there is much, if any, of a $$$ difference.



_________________
Silly, stupid white people might be waking up.
PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16346
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 8:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

dtrain34 wrote:
I never had a single issue with Lloyd leaving early.

I did post several times that it was disingenuous to say she was leaving to "declare for the WNBA draft." That was a convenient shorthand the typical fan would understand but which made the W seem like the attraction and not the Euros. (Not too many Americans would buy "I am leaving to pursue my lifelong dream of playing for Valosun Brno")



At least Fagan made that part of the equation clear.


Maybe. Loyd could have left at any time to go play in Europe - see Epiphany Prince and Schuye LaRue, for example. Instead, she didn't leave Notre Dame until she was eligible for the WNBA.


ArtBest23



Joined: 02 Jul 2013
Posts: 14550



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 8:08 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
dtrain34 wrote:
I never had a single issue with Lloyd leaving early.

I did post several times that it was disingenuous to say she was leaving to "declare for the WNBA draft." That was a convenient shorthand the typical fan would understand but which made the W seem like the attraction and not the Euros. (Not too many Americans would buy "I am leaving to pursue my lifelong dream of playing for Valosun Brno")



At least Fagan made that part of the equation clear.


Maybe. Loyd could have left at any time to go play in Europe - see Epiphany Prince and Schuye LaRue, for example. Instead, she didn't leave Notre Dame until she was eligible for the WNBA.


And she had no deadline to declare anything to play in Europe.


tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 9543



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 8:18 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

cthskzfn wrote:
linkster wrote:
Are there rules about pro teams and/or agents contacting college players during the season? It may well have been that up until ND lost to UConn Loyd had no idea of what her future could be like, but once her season was over Seattle could contact her and more than that, she could have been contacted by representatives of alien teams specifying what her earning potential could be if she turned pro as the No 1 pick. Knowing that you would definitely be the top choice in the draft might influence your decision and Loyd may not have had that assurance until after the FF semis.


If being the #1 pick does have financial advantages over #2, then it was imperative for her to jump now due to Stewart being #1 next year.

I wonder though if there is much, if any, of a $$$ difference.



The collective bargaining agreement has the first four players in the draft getting the same amount.


tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 9543



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 8:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

ArtBest23 wrote:
Nerd2 wrote:
I thought the quote that Muffet gave (with my emphasis added) in the linked article were very telling:
http://www.wsbt.com/sports/muffet-mcgraw-loyd-made-bad-decision-to-go-pro/32369432
Quote:
"She didn't really give us an opportunity to try to talk her out of it because the deadline was the very next day to declare. Wish we would have had time when she made that decision, which was apparently a couple weeks before."


A statement like that suggests to me that Muffet had a firm opinion as to what Jewell's decision should be. And her next statement reinforces that:
Quote:
I think it's a really bad decision for women, especially to try to leave early


Given the sequence of events, my suspicion is that Muffet had indicated her opinion strongly enough that Jewell did not feel she'd get honest feedback. I thought it was a bit interesting that neither school of the early declarers seemed to send a representative.


That feedback likely was "honest."

I have been fully supportive that it was Jewell's decision to make, but I don't think lying to your coach about your decision is a particularly good way to handle it.


From Loyd's perspective it saved her weeks or months of McGraw trying to talk her out of it and expressing disapproval or strained relations. She might not be welcome on campus in the future, but that might be irrelevant as she may not want to come back and visit.


cthskzfn



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 12851
Location: In a world where a PSYCHOpath like Trump isn't potus.


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 8:33 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

tfan wrote:
cthskzfn wrote:
linkster wrote:
Are there rules about pro teams and/or agents contacting college players during the season? It may well have been that up until ND lost to UConn Loyd had no idea of what her future could be like, but once her season was over Seattle could contact her and more than that, she could have been contacted by representatives of alien teams specifying what her earning potential could be if she turned pro as the No 1 pick. Knowing that you would definitely be the top choice in the draft might influence your decision and Loyd may not have had that assurance until after the FF semis.


If being the #1 pick does have financial advantages over #2, then it was imperative for her to jump now due to Stewart being #1 next year.

I wonder though if there is much, if any, of a $$$ difference.



The collective bargaining agreement has the first four players in the draft getting the same amount.


Thanks, but since the real $$$ is overseas, does #1 hold any advantage (other than the player's talent)?



_________________
Silly, stupid white people might be waking up.
tfan



Joined: 31 May 2010
Posts: 9543



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/15 9:12 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

cthskzfn wrote:
tfan wrote:
cthskzfn wrote:
linkster wrote:
Are there rules about pro teams and/or agents contacting college players during the season? It may well have been that up until ND lost to UConn Loyd had no idea of what her future could be like, but once her season was over Seattle could contact her and more than that, she could have been contacted by representatives of alien teams specifying what her earning potential could be if she turned pro as the No 1 pick. Knowing that you would definitely be the top choice in the draft might influence your decision and Loyd may not have had that assurance until after the FF semis.


If being the #1 pick does have financial advantages over #2, then it was imperative for her to jump now due to Stewart being #1 next year.

I wonder though if there is much, if any, of a $$$ difference.



The collective bargaining agreement has the first four players in the draft getting the same amount.


Thanks, but since the real $$$ is overseas, does #1 hold any advantage (other than the player's talent)?


Don't know, but I would guess that the main, and possibly only factor in determining the salary they are offered is the numbers they put up in the upcoming WNBA season, as well as any WNBA honors they get.


Luuuc
#NATC


Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 21901



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/15 1:07 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nerd2 wrote:
I thought the quote that Muffet gave (with my emphasis added) in the linked article were very telling:
http://www.wsbt.com/sports/muffet-mcgraw-loyd-made-bad-decision-to-go-pro/32369432
Quote:
"She didn't really give us an opportunity to try to talk her out of it because the deadline was the very next day to declare. Wish we would have had time when she made that decision, which was apparently a couple weeks before."


A statement like that suggests to me that Muffet had a firm opinion as to what Jewell's decision should be. And her next statement reinforces that:
Quote:
I think it's a really bad decision for women, especially to try to leave early


Given the sequence of events, my suspicion is that Muffet had indicated her opinion strongly enough that Jewell did not feel she'd get honest feedback. I thought it was a bit interesting that neither school of the early declarers seemed to send a representative.


It was my understanding that MM still had time to talk her out of it.
The declaration deadline might have been the next day, but after that weren't there a number of days during which players who had declared could reverse their decisions without eligibility penalty?



_________________
Thanks for calling. I wait all night for calls like these.
GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14102



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/15 1:24 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

tfan wrote:
cthskzfn wrote:
tfan wrote:
cthskzfn wrote:
linkster wrote:
Are there rules about pro teams and/or agents contacting college players during the season? It may well have been that up until ND lost to UConn Loyd had no idea of what her future could be like, but once her season was over Seattle could contact her and more than that, she could have been contacted by representatives of alien teams specifying what her earning potential could be if she turned pro as the No 1 pick. Knowing that you would definitely be the top choice in the draft might influence your decision and Loyd may not have had that assurance until after the FF semis.


If being the #1 pick does have financial advantages over #2, then it was imperative for her to jump now due to Stewart being #1 next year.

I wonder though if there is much, if any, of a $$$ difference.



The collective bargaining agreement has the first four players in the draft getting the same amount.


Thanks, but since the real $$$ is overseas, does #1 hold any advantage (other than the player's talent)?


Don't know, but I would guess that the main, and possibly only factor in determining the salary they are offered is the numbers they put up in the upcoming WNBA season, as well as any WNBA honors they get.


In the future their numbers in the WNBA and overseas will make a difference in what players get offered, but they are probably already getting offers and may sign a contract with an overseas team before the WNBA season starts so their 1st contract won't be dependent on their WNBA numbers and honors they receive throughout the season or after the season, but being the #1 pick, especially for an American could make a difference.


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14102



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/18/15 1:29 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Nerd2 wrote:

I thought it was a bit interesting that neither school of the early declarers seemed to send a representative.


Given how things have played out, at least the perception in the media, I could see why Jewell wouldn't invite Muffet McGraw to join her at the draft. (I don't know if she was invited, but it would be fair to say it's understandable if she wasn't)

I don't know what type of relationship Amanda Zahui B. had with the coaching staff at Minnesota, but she only played for them for 1 season so I could see her not feeling close enough to them to want to invite them.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin