RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Pac-12 Tournament
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2313
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 1:42 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GEF34 wrote:
myrtle wrote:
Now we have this entirely un interesting game UCLA - Arizona in which the only drama is how long will we have to wait after the game to hear that Arizona is conducting a new head coach search.


Like Patsweetpat I did not think this game was entirely uninteresting Wink

BTW did you get the email I sent you a couple of days ago?


You asking me, or myrtle? I'm guessing myrtle, 'cause I didn't receive an email.


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 1:49 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Day 1 Results:

#7 Washington State 66 #10 Oregon 64
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/05/oregon-vs-washington-state

#6 UCLA 80 #11 Arizona 62
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/05/arizona-vs-ucla

#9 Colorado 75 #8 USC 63
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/05/colorado-vs-usc

#5 Washington 75 #12 Utah 64
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/05/utah-vs-washington

Here is the schedule for Day 2:
All times are Pacific and games are shown on the Pac-12 Networks

11:30am #7 Washington State vs #2 Arizona State

2:00pm #6 UCLA vs #3 Stanford

6:00pm #9 Colorado vs #1 Oregon State

8:30pm #5 Washington vs #4 California


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 1:51 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

patsweetpat wrote:
GEF34 wrote:
myrtle wrote:
Now we have this entirely un interesting game UCLA - Arizona in which the only drama is how long will we have to wait after the game to hear that Arizona is conducting a new head coach search.


Like Patsweetpat I did not think this game was entirely uninteresting Wink

BTW did you get the email I sent you a couple of days ago?


You asking me, or myrtle? I'm guessing myrtle, 'cause I didn't receive an email.


I meant myrtle, sorry for the confusion.


patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2313
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 10:53 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GEF34 wrote:
patsweetpat wrote:
GEF34 wrote:
myrtle wrote:
Now we have this entirely un interesting game UCLA - Arizona in which the only drama is how long will we have to wait after the game to hear that Arizona is conducting a new head coach search.


Like Patsweetpat I did not think this game was entirely uninteresting Wink

BTW did you get the email I sent you a couple of days ago?


You asking me, or myrtle? I'm guessing myrtle, 'cause I didn't receive an email.


I meant myrtle, sorry for the confusion.


No, that's cool, that's what I assumed. Thanks for posting all the P12 Tourney info!


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 4:57 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

patsweetpat wrote:
GEF34 wrote:
patsweetpat wrote:
GEF34 wrote:
myrtle wrote:
Now we have this entirely un interesting game UCLA - Arizona in which the only drama is how long will we have to wait after the game to hear that Arizona is conducting a new head coach search.


Like Patsweetpat I did not think this game was entirely uninteresting Wink

BTW did you get the email I sent you a couple of days ago?


You asking me, or myrtle? I'm guessing myrtle, 'cause I didn't receive an email.


I meant myrtle, sorry for the confusion.


No, that's cool, that's what I assumed. Thanks for posting all the P12 Tourney info!


You're welcome, I'm glad to see the Pac-12 is getting some interest from other posters on here, I wasn't sure how many people would actually be interested when I first started, I obviously knew a few would like you and myrtle, but it's cool to see there are others as well.


summertime blues



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 7860
Location: Shenandoah Valley


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 5:01 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I would LOVE it if I could actually SEE Pac-12 games, however my budget will not allow subscriptions to all these "privately owned" networks so I have to make do with what my cable company deigns to let me have. I appreciate what I get in terms of information here.



_________________
Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 5:17 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

summertime blues wrote:
I would LOVE it if I could actually SEE Pac-12 games, however my budget will not allow subscriptions to all these "privately owned" networks so I have to make do with what my cable company deigns to let me have. I appreciate what I get in terms of information here.


This was posted earlier in the thread by scullyfu, but it bears repeating for those who missed it or forgot about it. And I'm not positive, but it looks like you maybe even be able to watch some replays of the games from the first 2 days as well.

Quote:
Free access to Pac-12 Networks on Pac-12.com and Pac-12 Now starts at midnight PT and runs throughout the day on March 7. Tournament coverage on Pac-12 Networks begins at 6 PT that day.


http://pac-12.com/article/2014/12/22/2015-pac-12-womens-basketball-tournament-tv-info-and-how-watch-online


summertime blues



Joined: 16 Apr 2013
Posts: 7860
Location: Shenandoah Valley


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 6:10 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Neat trick if I can do it, my computer is in a different room from my TV and there is this little matter of the SEC tournament Wink Plus at the moment I'm REALLY restricted because my cable box is dead and I don't know when
The Man will be able to get out of our snowbound driveway to get a new one. But thanks for the input anyway, maybe I can pick it up on my iPad.



_________________
Don't take life so serious. It ain't nohows permanent.
It takes 3 years to build a team and 7 to build a program.--Conventional Wisdom
myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32341



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 6:26 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GEF34 wrote:
myrtle wrote:
Now we have this entirely un interesting game UCLA - Arizona in which the only drama is how long will we have to wait after the game to hear that Arizona is conducting a new head coach search.


Like Patsweetpat I did not think this game was entirely uninteresting Wink

BTW did you get the email I sent you a couple of days ago?


no I don't see it and not in my spam either...maybe send a PM?



_________________
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
- Amanda Gorman
GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 7:09 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
GEF34 wrote:
myrtle wrote:
Now we have this entirely un interesting game UCLA - Arizona in which the only drama is how long will we have to wait after the game to hear that Arizona is conducting a new head coach search.


Like Patsweetpat I did not think this game was entirely uninteresting Wink

BTW did you get the email I sent you a couple of days ago?


no I don't see it and not in my spam either...maybe send a PM?


Ok, maybe I typed your email wrong, I just sent you a PM.


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/06/15 7:16 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

summertime blues wrote:
Neat trick if I can do it, my computer is in a different room from my TV and there is this little matter of the SEC tournament Wink Plus at the moment I'm REALLY restricted because my cable box is dead and I don't know when
The Man will be able to get out of our snowbound driveway to get a new one. But thanks for the input anyway, maybe I can pick it up on my iPad.


Hopefully it will work out and you can watch the games tomorrow. Since there are only Pac-12 games tomorrow night, maybe you can catch Day 1 and Day 2 games before the SEC Tournament starts (assuming of course they let you watch replays of games).

And the Pac-12 App works pretty well, I've used it a few times, not sure how it will work for the free trial though, in terms of what is available to you.


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 1:55 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Day 2 Results:

#2 Arizona State 67 #7 Washington State 48
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/06/washington-state-vs-arizona-state

#3 Stanford 65 #6 UCLA 62
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/06/ucla-vs-stanford

#9 Colorado 68 #1 Oregon State 65
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/06/colorado-vs-oregon-state

#4 California 69 #5 Washington 53
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/06/washington-vs-california

Here is the schedule for Day 3:
All times are Pacific and games are shown on the Pac-12 Networks

6:00pm #3 Stanford vs #2 Arizona State

8:30pm #9 Colorado vs #4 California


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 2:07 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Here are some interesting facts about the Pac-12 Tournament at the conclusion of Day 2.

For just the 2nd time the defending champion lost in the first round of the tournament (Arizona State in 2003)

Oregon State becomes the first #1 seed to not advance to the semifinals, and the 2nd #1 seed to not advance to the finals (Stanford lost in the semifinals in 2014).

Of the 4 teams that have won the Pac-10/12 Tournament Championships, 2 have advance to the semifinals, and they will be playing each other to go to the finals (Arizona State vs Stanford).


scullyfu



Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 8864
Location: Niagara Falls


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 8:00 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

i've been watching the Pac-12 tourney and have been thoroughly entertained. the game last night between the Colorado and OSU was a corker!

the Pac-12 is getting better all the time. so glad to see that the final will actually be on ESPN2 (?) so they can get greater exposure. there is some exciting ball out west.


cthskzfn



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 12851
Location: In a world where a PSYCHOpath like Trump isn't potus.


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 8:16 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

i'm psyched for the access to tonight's semis...WCB until 1am!

these freaking conf networks have cramped my style this year due to cablevision's reluctance to offer any other than the BTN.

i really hope i live long enough to see this !@#$! monopolized TV carrier system destroyed and enjoy a day in which the customer chooses the effing channels h/she wants to pay for. Evil or Very Mad

i believe the USA will have an out married lesbian black female POTUS first.



_________________
Silly, stupid white people might be waking up.
IM in OC



Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 1000
Location: Orange County, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 11:42 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Is Cal a team that now needs the 3 pointer to win a game?

Cal is now on a 6 game streak of sorts.

Going from the most recent game back 6 games

Cal vs UW - 8 for 20 for 40% on three pointers - Cal wins
Cal vs OSU - 0 for 7 for 0% on three pointers - Cal loses
Cal vs UO - 11 for 25 for 44% on three pointers - Cal wins
Cal vs Stanford - 8 for 19 for 42% on three pointers - Cal wins
Cal vs Stanford - 4 for 20 for 20% on three pointers - Cal loses
Cal vs USC - 1 for 11 for 9% on three pointers - Cal loses

Overall on the three wins Cal is 27 for 64 for 42%
on the three loses Cal is 5 for 38 for 13%


CompSci87



Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Posts: 812
Location: Palo Alto, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 12:21 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

IM, that seems true to me, but with a twist. Cal has been such a bad outside shooting team and so strong inside with Gray and with Boyd driving to the rim, that teams sag into the paint and dare Cal's shooters to beat them. Stanford certainly does that to an extreme.


patsweetpat



Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 2313
Location: Culver City, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 7:06 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

IM in OC wrote:
Is Cal a team that now needs the 3 pointer to win a game?

Cal is now on a 6 game streak of sorts.

Going from the most recent game back 6 games

Cal vs UW - 8 for 20 for 40% on three pointers - Cal wins
Cal vs OSU - 0 for 7 for 0% on three pointers - Cal loses
Cal vs UO - 11 for 25 for 44% on three pointers - Cal wins
Cal vs Stanford - 8 for 19 for 42% on three pointers - Cal wins
Cal vs Stanford - 4 for 20 for 20% on three pointers - Cal loses
Cal vs USC - 1 for 11 for 9% on three pointers - Cal loses

Overall on the three wins Cal is 27 for 64 for 42%
on the three loses Cal is 5 for 38 for 13%


It's true. In that loss to LBSU (current RPI: 107), Cal went 0 for 10 from beyond the arc. In their loss to Kansas (current RPI: 100), Cal went 2 for 11 from out there.

When Cal hits their 3-pointers (as they did both times they played UCLA, darnit), they're a very tough team to beat, 'cause Cal's always gonna find open looks (on account of defenses, by necessity, doubling Gray and/or Boyd). But when the Bears don't hit their 3-pointers, they can struggle.


myrtle



Joined: 02 May 2008
Posts: 32341



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 8:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Congrats to OSU. At least according to Charlie's bracket, they are now a three seed in Spokane rather than a two in Albany. Much better! Now if we can get him to move Stanford out of that region, I'd be happy. Very Happy


FollowtheCardinalRule



Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 5153
Location: Denver


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/07/15 11:23 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

myrtle wrote:
Congrats to OSU. At least according to Charlie's bracket, they are now a three seed in Spokane rather than a two in Albany. Much better! Now if we can get him to move Stanford out of that region, I'd be happy. Very Happy


I don't see why you'd send Kentucky to Spokane geographically that doesn't make sense. You'd send Kentucky to a closer region.

If Stanford and Cal are both four seeds, you reckon one of them ends up in Spokane, with the other having to travel somewhere.


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/08/15 1:15 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Wouldn't it be something with all the talk of Stanford having "fallen off their perch" or having a down year and this being their year of parity in the Pac-12 Stanford wins the Pac-12 Tournament the 11th time.


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/08/15 1:51 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Day 3 Results:

#3 Stanford 59 #2 Arizona State 56
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/07/stanford-vs-arizona-state

#4 California 68 #9 Colorado 55
http://pac-12.com/womens-basketball/event/2015/03/07/colorado-vs-california

Here is the schedule for Day 4:
Time is Pacific and game are shown on ESPN

6:00pm #4 California vs #3 Stanford


GEF34



Joined: 23 Jul 2008
Posts: 14119



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/08/15 2:38 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Fun facts about the finals:

-This is the first #3 vs #4 match up in Pac-12 Tournament History

-This will be the 3rd time Stanford will play California in the finals (previously in 2008 and 2012)

-This is the 8th time 2 teams from California will meet in the finals

-Stanford is the 6th #3 seed to advance to the finals

-Stanford can be the 3rd #3 seed to win the Pac-12 Tournament Championship

-Stanford can win it's 11th Pac-12 Tournament Championship

-California is the first #4 seed to advance to the finals

-California is playing in their 3rd Pac-12 Tournament finals

-California can win it's 1st Pac-12 Tournament Championship

Edited: to fix a typo.




Last edited by GEF34 on 03/08/15 10:38 am; edited 1 time in total
FollowtheCardinalRule



Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 5153
Location: Denver


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/08/15 9:15 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

GEF34 wrote:
Fun facts about the finals:

-This is the first #3 vs #4 match up in Pac-12 Tournament History

-This will be the 3rd time Stanford will play California in the finals (previously in 2008 and 2012)

-This is the 8th time 2 teams from California will meet in the finals

-Stanford is the 6th #3 seed to advance to the finals

-Stanford can be the 3rd #3 seed to win the Pac-12 Tournament Championship

-Stanford can win it's 11th Pac-12 Tournament Championship

-California is the first #4 seed to advance to the finals

-California is playing in their 2nd Pac-12 Tournament finals

-California can win it's 1st Pac-12 Tournament Championship


It still amazes me that Cal is only in their second Pac-12 Tourney Finals. You'd think that there'd be more over the Devani Hampton Years.


CompSci87



Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Posts: 812
Location: Palo Alto, CA


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/08/15 9:47 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Something off there. This is only the 2nd Cal final, but the 3rd Stanford vs. Cal final?


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin