View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rustedsyringe
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1001 Location: Tulsa
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 10:38 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
If Neraska isn't under 10 by the 10 minute mark... put a fork in their amazing season.
|
|
GoIndeeeee
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 1255
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 10:40 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I wonder if Oklahoma would rather play Kentucky?
|
|
bballfan2005
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 25315 Location: Somewhere here and there
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 10:40 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
GoIndeeeee wrote: |
I wonder if Oklahoma would rather play Kentucky? |
They're fools if they believe that. They don't want none of this.
_________________ Avatar: The King has his ring!
Mathies to LA 2013
|
|
goldy
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 421
Back to top |
|
bballfan2005
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 25315 Location: Somewhere here and there
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 10:45 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
LMAO!!!!!!!!!! NPOY has to wait until the SEC POY exits the game to score.
_________________ Avatar: The King has his ring!
Mathies to LA 2013
|
|
stormmerc
Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 148 Location: New Orleans
Back to top |
|
njjosh
Joined: 07 Nov 2004 Posts: 1458
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 10:47 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Well I guess this further ensures that, barring a historic upset, a UConn-Stanford title game is a lock.
Kentucky may very well beat Oklahoma on Tuesday. But UConn and Stanford are just laying such waste to the field it's hard to imagine anyone actually beating them.
|
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 67058 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
|
rustedsyringe
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1001 Location: Tulsa
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 10:52 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Is this passive aggression really necessary? (And I hope I never have to type "aggression" and "necessary" in the same sentence again. Two 'g's? Two 's's? Both? Two 'c's or two 's's?)
|
|
bballfan2005
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 25315 Location: Somewhere here and there
Back to top |
|
stormmerc
Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 148 Location: New Orleans
Back to top |
|
pilight
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 67058 Location: Where the action is
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 10:59 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Oh dear, the refs are going to try to give Nebraska this game.
_________________ I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
|
|
mekanos
Joined: 21 Mar 2009 Posts: 756
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:00 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
I was wondering what the heck that last call was ... lol
|
|
p_d_swanson
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 9713
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:03 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
njjosh wrote: |
Playing in the Big 12 north? |
Yes, it's unfortunate none of the Big 12 South teams had the opportunity to play them this season...
|
|
GoIndeeeee
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 1255
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:04 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
This has been the craziest game. Ball knocked into the basket, ball stops on top of basket, chaos ... it's fun to watch.
|
|
stormmerc
Joined: 04 Oct 2009 Posts: 148 Location: New Orleans
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:05 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
How in the world did that go in? Talk about fate.
|
|
Shades
Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 63880
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:07 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Ball's bouncing Kentucky's way tonight.
Can't say Nebraska is going down without a fight.
_________________ Nnekalonians 1:14 - Thou shalt not accept that which is not earned
Last edited by Shades on 03/28/10 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
justynkarr
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 559
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:07 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Did Cory Montgomery really just score for Kentucky?!?!? LMAO
|
|
Force10rulz
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 1966 Location: Puget Sound
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:13 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Huskers woke up enough to make this a much better game, but I'm glad the Wildcats will take this one.
_________________ Seattle Storm 3 times Champions
|
|
njjosh
Joined: 07 Nov 2004 Posts: 1458
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:16 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
No question that Nebraska is coming back to the pack next year after losing Griffin and 5 other seniors. But will they ever be able to get back to this point? Or will they return into obscurity?
|
|
bballfan2005
Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 25315 Location: Somewhere here and there
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:17 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Nebraska 2009-10 = Duke 2006-07
_________________ Avatar: The King has his ring!
Mathies to LA 2013
|
|
coffy73
Joined: 24 Sep 2009 Posts: 2603
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:26 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
njjosh wrote: |
No question that Nebraska is coming back to the pack next year after losing Griffin and 5 other seniors. But will they ever be able to get back to this point? Or will they return into obscurity? |
Definitely return to obscurity, look at Louisville.
|
|
mikeyc22
Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 2396
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:27 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
bballfan2005 wrote: |
Nebraska 2009-10 = Duke 2006-07 |
Yup lose in conference tourney semis and in Sweet 16 to the 4 seed
|
|
24duzitall
Joined: 19 May 2005 Posts: 1293 Location: Kentucky
Back to top |
|
njjosh
Joined: 07 Nov 2004 Posts: 1458
Back to top |
Posted: 03/28/10 11:47 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
mikeyc22 wrote: |
bballfan2005 wrote: |
Nebraska 2009-10 = Duke 2006-07 |
Yup lose in conference tourney semis and in Sweet 16 to the 4 seed |
Bad comparison. Nebraska had never reached the Sweet 16 before. Yes, it's very disappointing to lose this soon, but it was still a historic season, way above expectations.
The 2006-07 Duke team was coming off choking away the national championship game. It was expected to get back there and win. The program also had a history of NCAA tourney disappointments (see Minnesota in 2004 and Tennessee in 2003 after entering the Final Four at 35-1).
VERY different level of expectations and very different perspective.
The better comparison for this Nebraska team was the Jameer Nelson-led St. Joseph's men's team that came out of nowhere in 2004, went undefeated in the regular season, lost in its first conference tournament game and lost in the Elite 8 on a three-pointer with 5 seconds left.
|
|
|
|