RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Round three comparison

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66927
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/30/08 11:13 pm    ::: Round three comparison Reply Reply with quote

Upsets

Men 2
Women 0

Close games

Men 1
Women 1

Blowouts

Men 2
Women 0

Teams scoring 80+

Men 3
Women 1

Teams scoring 90+

Men 1
Women 0


Tournament through three

Upsets

Men 13
Women 7

Close games

Men 19
Women 16

Blowouts

Men 14
Women 16

Teams scoring 80+

Men 18
Women 20

Teams scoring 90+

Men 6
Women 3



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
CamrnCrz1974



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18371
Location: Phoenix


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/30/08 11:38 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

With upsets, you have to consider two of the women's upsets were #5 over #4 (IIRC). The men had four teams seeded 7th or higher make the Sweet 16, including three teams in double digits.

But other than Davidson, the men's Elite Eight went according to seed.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66927
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/31/08 6:19 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

CamrnCrz1974 wrote:
With upsets, you have to consider two of the women's upsets were #5 over #4 (IIRC). The men had four teams seeded 7th or higher make the Sweet 16, including three teams in double digits.

But other than Davidson, the men's Elite Eight went according to seed.


The men also had a #5 over a #4.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
CamrnCrz1974



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18371
Location: Phoenix


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/31/08 7:21 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
The men also had a #5 over a #4.


But two of the women's seven upsets were a #5 over a #4, whereas one of the men's thirteen upsets was a #5 over a #4. Much smaller percentage on the men's side for the "upset" that only involves a difference of one seed.


pilight



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 66927
Location: Where the action is


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/31/08 7:23 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

CamrnCrz1974 wrote:
pilight wrote:
The men also had a #5 over a #4.


But two of the women's seven upsets were a #5 over a #4, whereas one of the men's thirteen upsets was a #5 over a #4. Much smaller percentage on the men's side for the "upset" that only involves a difference of one seed.


The men also had two #9 over #8 upsets compared to one for the women.



_________________
I'm a lonely frog
I ain't got a home
CamrnCrz1974



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 18371
Location: Phoenix


Back to top
PostPosted: 03/31/08 7:25 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

pilight wrote:
The men also had two #9 over #8 upsets compared to one for the women.


9/8 and 5/4...added together, that means 3 out of 7 for the women, 3 out of 13 for the men. Still a much bigger percentage on the men's side for the upsets with a difference of one placement.


mercfan3



Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 19763



Back to top
PostPosted: 03/31/08 12:22 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I think the blowouts are more interesting...seeing as #1 vs. #16 seed on the women's side is pretty much a guaranteed blowout, and pretty much the same as a #2 and #15 seed. Where as Men are supposed to be much closer.



_________________
“Anyone point out that a Donald Trump anagram is ‘Lord Dampnut’”- Colin Mochrie
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin