| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
StanfordBBFan
Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 28
Location: next door to Stanford University
Back to top |
 Posted: 03/30/07 8:13 pm ::: |
Reply  |
|
| LTF1 wrote: |
| Of course there are double-standards (there shouldn't be, but there are), but I am not sure this case applies. If no one ever alleged or complained of a relationship between "George" and "Danielle" while he was coaching she, than the fact that they apparently got together afterward is immaterial. |
No, they didn't get together afterward. They got married afterward, but they were definitely an item while he was her coach--the only question for sure is how much of an item while she was still a minor. There was no secret about this relationship. There may have been complaints, but Danielle was such a big star compared to the others on her team that they got buried if there were any.
I just scrounged up a bio on Danielle that indicates timeline a little bit here.
Last edited by StanfordBBFan on 03/30/07 8:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Kamala
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 113
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/30/07 8:15 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
| LTF1 wrote: |
Of course there are double-standards (there shouldn't be, but there are), but I am not sure this case applies. If no one ever alleged or complained of a relationship between "George" and "Danielle" while he was coaching she, than the fact that they apparently got together afterward is immaterial. IE if he didn't hit on her while he was coaching her, then there is no problem.
IF Chatman was involved with a former player who was on the team at the time, and then someone (eg said player, parent, grandpa, whoever) later made a complaint, then that is a problem. |
LTF1 please read StanfordBBFan's comments!! Thanks StanfordBBFan. I really appreciate that.
_________________
The cotton field is next door to the ball field.
|
|
LTF1
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 2252
Location: Louisiana
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/30/07 8:20 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Kamala:"LTF1 please read StanfordBBFan's comments!! Thanks StanfordBBFan. I really appreciate that."
Well, I read 'em again but I am still missing something but no matter.
If "they were definitely an item while he was her coach--the only question for sure is how much of an item while she was still a minor"
then if he hit on her while she was a minor, he should be in jail. If he hit on her while she was of age but coaching her, then he should have been fired. |
|
StanfordBBFan
Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 28
Location: next door to Stanford University
Back to top |
|
StanfordBBFan
Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 28
Location: next door to Stanford University
Back to top |
|
LTF1
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 2252
Location: Louisiana
Back to top |
| Posted: 03/30/07 8:35 pm ::: |
Reply |
|
Hey Kamala, is that you I saw over at Tigerdroppings? I'm not registered to post there but I lurk sometimes to get a hold of the latest rumors (which you will note I have the good sense not to repeat here)
I give you credit for going in to the Tiger's den over there, most of those folks make me look downright progressive  |
|
Kamala
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 113
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Back to top |
|
|
|
Of course, though he did coach her at Stanford, they also didn't get married until 2 years after she graduated. Timeline there has always been awfully fuzzy... 
