RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

Fever @ Sun - 5/14/24
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who will win this game?
Fever
30%
 30%  [ 3 ]
Sun
70%
 70%  [ 7 ]
Total Votes : 10

Author Message
PRballer



Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 2559



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 8:04 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

mercfan3 wrote:
Hate to start this already, but WNBA refs HAVE to be better.

People payed hundreds..and some paid thousands to see Clark. And you call her for 2 touch fouls in the first five minutes of the game.. Come on..

She shouldn’t get Princess treatment, but don’t be stupid the other way either..


Very well said.


ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 11201



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 8:44 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PRballer wrote:
mercfan3 wrote:
Hate to start this already, but WNBA refs HAVE to be better.

People payed hundreds..and some paid thousands to see Clark. And you call her for 2 touch fouls in the first five minutes of the game.. Come on..

She shouldn’t get Princess treatment, but don’t be stupid the other way either..


Very well said.


OK, what's your solution?



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
ucbart



Joined: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 2826
Location: New York


Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 9:13 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Queenie wrote:
mercfan3 wrote:
Hate to start this already, but WNBA refs HAVE to be better.

People payed hundreds..and some paid thousands to see Clark. And you call her for 2 touch fouls in the first five minutes of the game.. Come on..

She shouldn’t get Princess treatment, but don’t be stupid the other way either..


Then she should... IDK... not commit fouls. I don't care how much people paid to see her. The last fucking thing we need is her getting Jordan Rules.


I think college refs did Clark a MAJOR disservice when calling her games. She was often allowed to do whatever she wanted in college and nothing was ever called on her, so she is accustomed to committing dumb fouls and never hearing a whistle. Now, she is not only in the pros, but she is also playing against players that are 25x better than 99.9999999999999999% of anyone she was ever on the floor with in college. It's going to be a massive adjustment.


mercfan3



Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 19813



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 9:33 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Queenie wrote:
mercfan3 wrote:
Hate to start this already, but WNBA refs HAVE to be better.

People payed hundreds..and some paid thousands to see Clark. And you call her for 2 touch fouls in the first five minutes of the game.. Come on..

She shouldn’t get Princess treatment, but don’t be stupid the other way either..


Then she should... IDK... not commit fouls. I don't care how much people paid to see her. The last fucking thing we need is her getting Jordan Rules.


But in the context of the game she didn’t. They called her for touch fouls while CT was manhandling the entire team. The first one hardly had any contact.

Again, I’m not asking for Princess treatment. I’m saying don’t call her for shit you aren’t calling the other nine players on the floor for either. It’s a business, refs have to know who the entertainment is.



_________________
“Anyone point out that a Donald Trump anagram is ‘Lord Dampnut’”- Colin Mochrie
ClayK



Joined: 11 Oct 2005
Posts: 11201



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 9:54 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

I never saw a replay of the first foul. If there was contact that affected the shot, it might be a "touch foul," but it's still a foul.

The second one was a foul because again, it affected the shot. Now sometimes that foul isn't called, but this time it was. I don't think the officials should be too concerned about "protecting" Caitlin Clark at this point in her career.

Oh, and she's a bad defender too. On the first foul, she either should try to defend or make sure the ref can't blow the whistle. She did neither -- a half-hearted effort.

And again, all the whining about officials makes people feel better, I'm sure, but does that help solve the problem? And what is the solution, aside from more whining?



_________________
Oṃ Tāre Tuttāre Ture Svāhā
J-Spoon



Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 6827



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 2:34 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Is it too early to start the free K. Mitchell campaign?

Since the lottery draw I have thought Clark and Mitchell aren’t a good combo on either side of the court and Mitchell was going to be the one left out.

Should I give it longer?


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16379
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 3:27 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

mercfan3 wrote:
Queenie wrote:
mercfan3 wrote:
Hate to start this already, but WNBA refs HAVE to be better.

People payed hundreds..and some paid thousands to see Clark. And you call her for 2 touch fouls in the first five minutes of the game.. Come on..

She shouldn’t get Princess treatment, but don’t be stupid the other way either..


Then she should... IDK... not commit fouls. I don't care how much people paid to see her. The last fucking thing we need is her getting Jordan Rules.


But in the context of the game she didn’t. They called her for touch fouls while CT was manhandling the entire team. The first one hardly had any contact.

Again, I’m not asking for Princess treatment. I’m saying don’t call her for shit you aren’t calling the other nine players on the floor for either.


That's the thing. I know I am not an unbiased observer, but watching the game I said to my husband that it looked like the refs were trying to put her in her place. It was bizarre.


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16379
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 3:29 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

J-Spoon wrote:
Is it too early to start the free K. Mitchell campaign?

Since the lottery draw I have thought Clark and Mitchell aren’t a good combo on either side of the court and Mitchell was going to be the one left out.

Should I give it longer?


I'm giving it longer, but they need to find a way to get Mitchell and Clark together on the floor as much as possible. Having to defend Mitchell opens things up for Clark and vice versa. I get that you want them at the same position, but Sides has to figure out a way to make it work.

How does KLS played 50% more than Mitchell? Insane.


greg5222



Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 728



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 4:15 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

Double digits turnovers!! Wow just wow!!

PEACE & LOVE GO MYSTICS!!!!!



_________________
"There will never be any PEACE until GOD is seated at the conference table." The Chi-Lites
threadkiller1201



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 433



Back to top
PostPosted: 05/15/24 6:52 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote

PUmatty wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
Is it too early to start the free K. Mitchell campaign?

Since the lottery draw I have thought Clark and Mitchell aren’t a good combo on either side of the court and Mitchell was going to be the one left out.

Should I give it longer?


I'm giving it longer, but they need to find a way to get Mitchell and Clark together on the floor as much as possible. Having to defend Mitchell opens things up for Clark and vice versa. I get that you want them at the same position, but Sides has to figure out a way to make it work.

How does KLS played 50% more than Mitchell? Insane.


Wasn't Mitchell injured? Or minutes restriction?


PUmatty



Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 16379
Location: Chicago


Back to top
PostPosted: 05/16/24 8:18 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote

threadkiller1201 wrote:
PUmatty wrote:
J-Spoon wrote:
Is it too early to start the free K. Mitchell campaign?

Since the lottery draw I have thought Clark and Mitchell aren’t a good combo on either side of the court and Mitchell was going to be the one left out.

Should I give it longer?


I'm giving it longer, but they need to find a way to get Mitchell and Clark together on the floor as much as possible. Having to defend Mitchell opens things up for Clark and vice versa. I get that you want them at the same position, but Sides has to figure out a way to make it work.

How does KLS played 50% more than Mitchell? Insane.


Wasn't Mitchell injured? Or minutes restriction?


Oh, it looks like you're right. She has an injured ankle and just started practicing on Friday. Let's hope that is all it was and she will be back fully.


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » WNBA All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin