RebKell's Junkie Boards
Board Junkies Forums
 
Log in Register FAQ Memberlist Search RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index

SI much too early top 10

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
beknighted



Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Posts: 11050
Location: Lost in D.C.


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/14 3:50 pm    ::: SI much too early top 10 Reply Reply with quote
Much though I love Rutgers, I'm a bit surprised to find the Scarlet Knights on this list.

Can't we at least wait until the summer for these?
Oldfandepot2



Joined: 05 Jul 2013
Posts: 996
Location: Northeast


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/16/14 8:05 pm    ::: Re: SI much too early top 10 Reply Reply with quote
beknighted wrote:
Much though I love Rutgers, I'm a bit surprised to find the Scarlet Knights on this list.

Can't we at least wait until the summer for these?


Must do it for the publicity particularly on the heels of the Final Four when interest in the game is at its peak.

That aside, again. When are they going to learn, geez. ND is number two in the nation not sixth. Dopes.



_________________
Cave Canem!
We must listen to each other no matter how much it hurts. Bishop Desmond Tutu.
FollowtheCardinalRule



Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 5153
Location: Denver


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/14 2:17 am    ::: Re: SI much too early top 10 Reply Reply with quote
Oldfandepot2 wrote:
beknighted wrote:
Much though I love Rutgers, I'm a bit surprised to find the Scarlet Knights on this list.

Can't we at least wait until the summer for these?


Must do it for the publicity particularly on the heels of the Final Four when interest in the game is at its peak.

That aside, again. When are they going to learn, geez. ND is number two in the nation not sixth. Dopes.


Baylor without Odyssey a top 10 team? Confused


If Baylor is a Top 10 Team without Odyssey and Mackenzie, then Stanford is a Top 10 Team without Ruef and Ogwumike.
ScottS



Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 624



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/14 8:36 am    ::: Reply Reply with quote
For Baylor it will all boil down to Prince's status. She was hurt all this year. Yes, Odyssey is gone. Griner is long gone. Nina Davis was great but next season she will have higher expectations and won't have Odyssey there. My guess is that #10 is too high. I'd say more like #16 or so, but KM seems to get more out of teams than you would think (except in Griner's last year).
RP



Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Posts: 1299



Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/14 4:28 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
I guess it's up to the minute: UNC drops six spots to No. 8.




Last edited by RP on 04/17/14 4:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
beknighted



Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Posts: 11050
Location: Lost in D.C.


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/14 4:36 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
RP wrote:
I guess it's up to the minute--UNC drops six spots to No. 8.


And one more reason why these early rankings are silly.
Howee



Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 15737
Location: OREGON (in my heart)


Back to top
PostPosted: 04/17/14 10:30 pm    ::: Reply Reply with quote
beknighted wrote:
RP wrote:
I guess it's up to the minute--UNC drops six spots to No. 8.


And one more reason why these early rankings are silly.


Quite true.

But. Positive exposure is....positive exposure.



_________________
Oregon: Go Ducks!
"Inévitablement, les canards voleront"
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RebKell's Junkie Boards Forum Index » NCAA Women's Basketball - General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001- 2004 phpBB Group
phpBB Template by Vjacheslav Trushkin