RebKell's Junkie Boards

[Phil]

If anyone is interested in exploring this further, I started a list at:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnpjvR_kW6qvdFc4ckppd1Q2UGRLMkVCY181dUZnWWc&usp=sharing

Anyone can edit, so feel free to add the counts for schools you know about

Only a handful of schools listed so far, but a scholarship limit of 13 doesn't appear to have a lot of impact. I see only six players in the eleven schools listed who would be affected, and several teams within the top schools who could absorb those players without going over the limit, so I think the purported benefits (pushing some bench players down to lower tier schools where they would play more ) are over-stated.

We need a few more entries to draw firmer conclusions, so I hope some other will add some entries.

I sorted the list by Sagarin ranking, because the thesis is that the scholarship limitation would move players down to weaker schools, which might then become stronger, and the Sagarin ranking was the easiest way I could find to sort the teams.

[beknighted]

It won't let me edit, for whatever reason.

Rutgers has 11 players on its current roster, all scholarship athletes. It will be 12 next year.

Here's the URL for the roster: http://www.scarletknights.com/basketball-women/roster/roster.asp

[scfastpitch]

Have no idea how to edit that , but South Carolina currently has 10 scholarship players and 2 walkons .

[Phil]

My apologies, I changed the access so anyone with the link can view, missed that I also have to change it so anyone with the link can edit.

Now changed

I made the South Carolina and Rutgers changes

[allenleavell]

The count for scholarship is 15 right?

[Phil]

[FS02]